Navigating complex urban eco-problems with systems thinking, design and visualization.
As urban inhabitants and designers, we are sensitive to the experience of the city as both a social community and built environment that creates our beliefs about the city and our society. The city’s urban ecosystems by their nature are dynamic and complex. SystemCity group is an action-based research and think tank group focused around complex urban ecosystem problems.
The inter-relationships of urban infrastructure, food and shelter provision, and social/cultural network structures in our communities, requires creative visual and imaginative tools of a systemic design nature to understand and make sense of these complex urban patterns. As a research think tank, the approach is to use systems design visualization tools and methods in the collection, recognition, interpretation and identification of urban city patterns, behaviours and eco-integrated relationships.
Through the use of mapping techniques, soft systems thinking analysis, and foresight methods and techniques, design collaborators can engage in interpretation and emergent sensemaking approaches to navigate, sustain and implement change.
Exploring Innovation in Housing Typologies
Report by SystemCity Research Group, 2018. Exploring Innovation in Housing Typologies (Dowload Summary PDF)
Mapping Neighborhood Living Patterns
The notion of the city as an evolving organism, where people, and the city support of soft infrastructure is as important as that hard infrastructure service systems signifies a shifting focus to human centred community planning with respect to infrastructure development.
This is a research project to gather knowledge about livable community eco - infrastructure in the downtown core neighborhoods of Toronto as case studies. The investigation maps patterns of cultural, social, entrepreneurial, and residential identity and supports within the context of neighborhood land use allocations. An inventory of communal activity centres, residential typologies, social infrastructure, location, density, and amenity will provide strategic community patterns for understanding key community ecosystems.
Utilizing Toronto’s downtown neighborhoods and urban fabric as laboratory, and a variety of visualization methods and map types to capture salient information,there is an enormous opportunity for knowledge visualization and mapping; graphically, digitally, and virtually. The collection, use and interpreting of data into defining patterns and behaviours is necessary for a sociological developing city, and the task of processing, and interpreting this data into strategic opportunities for new types of tools and methods for capturing, measuring, quantifying, data, and interpretive analysis in an on-going interactive way.
These “livable patterns” provide information for future sustainable strategies and development such as social structure support, residential and community development, community gardens, urban farming and infrastructure building.SystemCity research will support innovation development and implementation in city infrastructure, and could work extensively with commercial and municipal partners to achieve this realization. For more information contact Jeremy Bowes.
Alternate Approaches to Urbanized Dwelling – Backyard and Alley Infill
This research project is targeted at identifying alternate housing infill typologies that are appropriate for urban contexts. Garage and backyard infill, granny flats, and laneway housing are all typologies that build density without vertical concentration, and with less impact on the existing infrastructure and neighborhoods. Identifying residential typologies and development opportunities within the context of selected Toronto urban communities for potential residential infill prototypesprovides a strategic system understanding and framework for further affordable residential community possibilities and support building within this ecosystem. Opportunities for housing infill are a focus,while consideration of dwelling infill types and affordability beyond financial factors suggests alternative prototypes of co-living, shared dwelling, and other approaches to affordable urban living for the city that can be prototyped.For more information contact Jeremy Bowes.
This context of a “disruptive” and a temporary city community is an exciting one, because it is not defined by zoning or urban planning but by the context of need. This research focuses on essential living elements, and available urban materials to create temporary dwelling prototypes that integrate into a variety of community contexts and provide alternatives to a variety of homelessness conditions. Exploration of stationary and mobile homeless street solutions, emergency and disaster relief needs provide a primary agenda for temporary living prototypes.For more information contact Jeremy Bowes.
- Mapping Neighborhood Ecologies – Patterns and eco-infrastructure
- Defining Affordable Housing Criteria
- Alternate Approaches to Urbanized Dwelling – Backyard and alley infill
- Transient Communities – Mobile, relief, and emergency habitat
- Resilient Cities – Approaches to sustainable city planning and risk-proofing
- Sustainable Policy and Implementation
- Urban Farming – Alternative urban green growing
- Regenerative Urban Ecosystems
- Accessible and Green Transportation
- Urban Material Ecosystems – Regenerative strategies
Related Major Research Projects (MRPs) in Strategic Foresight & Innovation
For more information please contact: Jeremy Bowes